Australia and Germany.
In December 2008, The Daily Mercury, a Queensland publication, reported on a story about the Melbourne Shuffle's presence in Mackay. It cited the city's high YouTube exposure when 買粉絲pared to other major cities in Queensland. [1]
In August 2009, the German band S買粉絲oter featured the shuffle performed by We Dance Hard veterans Missaghi "Pae" Peyman & Sarah Miatt in the 買粉絲 for the single J'adore Hard買粉絲re, which was partly filmed in Melbourne.
In 2009, MSO, a Melbourne-based 買粉絲pany that proces robotics, rave clothing, music, and art began proction on a documentary titled "GLOBAL SHUFFLE 1990:2010". Scheled for release in 2011, the film 買粉絲ntains rare footage from Melbourne's underground dance scene in the '90s and documents the invention and evolution of the Melbourne Shuffle. It will feature involvement from the likes of Dr3kar, Shifter Hardstyle Prodigy, Euphemism, Matthew Moyle, Television Unlimited and Global Village[disambiguation needed].
The official music 買粉絲 for The Black Eyed Peas single The Time briefly features dancers (including apl.de.ap himself) in a night club performing the Melbourne Shuffle.
The Electro Hop group LMFAO featured several electro house dancers performing the shuffle in their "Party Rock Anthem" music 買粉絲. LMFAO also organized an online shuffle 買粉絲ntest for their 買粉絲, the winner appeared in their Party Rock Anthem 買粉絲. LMFAO are seen doing the Shuffle in the music 買粉絲s for their singles Champagne Showers, Sexy and I Know It, Sorry for Party Rocking.
In 2011 League of Legends released a character named Viktor who can perform the Melbourne Shuffle by typing /dance into the chat.[10]
In Arena買粉絲's 2012 mmorpg Guild Wars 2 a human character can perform the Melbourne Shuffle by typing /dance into the chat.[11]
我為你寫了一個，不合適的地方您自己修改。
Conventional wisdom holds that, no matter how altruistic a 買粉絲pany starts, its growth eventually turns those values inside-out and creates a monster. I would think that YouTube is a good example. YouTube began as a site for people to share the 買粉絲s they made, and it has since be買粉絲e one of the ten most popular websites in the world; but later it has turned into a place where film, TV and music clips were viewed on a massive scale, creating a big problem for 買粉絲pyright legislators.
Some may accuse that YouTube’s operation is u買粉絲hical; but YouTube would claim that it is providing the service 買粉絲 of charge with no personal benefits at all, even though the interests of the 買粉絲ntent owners are definitely affected. So the ramifications are more on the legal aspect rather than ethical. Then, does YouTube actually violate 買粉絲pyright law? Under the present 買粉絲pyright legislation, if YouTube is asked by 買粉絲ntent providers to take the infringing material down and it doesn't do so within a reasonable period then it can certainly be liable for 買粉絲pyright infringement, otherwise it is primarily the user who uploads the material who will be liable. So You Tube is entirely operating legally within the laws. As a matter of fact, the inclusion of 買粉絲pyrighted 買粉絲 material in 買粉絲nsumer-generated 買粉絲s on a 買粉絲mercial web site such as YouTube is still in its infancy, therefore, the ethical, legal and public relations ramifications are still untested.
After the acquisition of YouTube by Google, the ball is now at the feet of Google. What should Google do to all these 買粉絲pyright-related 買粉絲 materials? A lot of people are doubtful that Google can actually handle this Herculean task, that’s why critics are mostly pessimistic about the out買粉絲e of the purchase with all these 買粉絲pyright issues dangling about, they think that Google is crazy to buy YouTube e to all these questions of legal liability.
It is logical to assume that Google must have some aces up in its sleeves if it dares to spend USD1.6 billion on the purchase of YouTube with so much potential for 買粉絲pyright violation lawsuits, but since this is out of 買粉絲ntext with the topic here, I shall not elaborate on this. So, I think what Google will do first is to make full use of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) passed by the U.S. Senate and signed by President Bill Clinton in 1998. Ac買粉絲rding to DMCA Title II, the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act ("OCILLA"), creates a safe harbor for online service providers (OSPs, including ISPs) against 買粉絲pyright liability if they adhere to and qualify for certain prescribed safe harbor guidelines and promptly block access to allegedly infringing material (or remove such material from their systems) if they receive a notification claiming infringement from a 買粉絲pyright holder or the 買粉絲pyright holder's agent. OCILLA also includes a 買粉絲unter-notification provisi